<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" >

<channel>
	<title>m-bike.org &#187; Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog</link>
	<description>Promoting non-motorized transportation in the Motor City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candice Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeFazio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray LaHood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Enhancements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 1993, biking and walking transportation have been better supported with each new transportation bill: Safe Routes to School, Transportation Enhancements, Bike/Pedestrian coordinators at the state DOT&#8217;s, and more. That&#8217;s could end soon. Today the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted on a new federal transportation bill &#8212; an 800-page bill that none of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 1993, biking and walking transportation have been better supported with each new transportation bill: <a href="http://www.saferoutesmichigan.org/">Safe Routes to School</a>, <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/transportation-enhancements">Transportation Enhancements</a>, Bike/Pedestrian coordinators at the state DOT&#8217;s, and more.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s could end soon.</p>
<p>Today the <a title="House Transportation Committee" href="http://transportation.house.gov/" target="_blank">House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee</a> voted on a new federal transportation bill &#8212; an 800-page bill that none of the legislators admitted to reading since its release just two days prior.</p>
<p>Current U.S. DOT Transportation Secretary and form Republican congressman <strong>Ray LaHood</strong> <a title="Politico" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72369.html" target="_blank">told Politico</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;This is the most partisan transportation bill that I have ever seen. And it also is the most anti-safety bill I have ever seen. It hollows out our No. 1 priority, which is safety, and frankly, it hollows out the guts of the transportation efforts that we&#8217;ve been about for the last three years.<strong> It&#8217;s the worst transportation bill I&#8217;ve ever seen during 35 years of public service</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oregon&#8217;s Representative <strong>Peter DeFazio</strong> called it &#8220;a transportation bill with an ideological wish list &#8211; drafted with Big Oil companies in mind &#8211; that will prevent Congress from passing a measure that could provide real transportation improvements.&#8221;</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bikeleague.org">League of American Bicyclists</a> have put together this <a title="League of American Bicyclists" href="http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2012/02/10-top-problems-with-the-house-transportation-bill/" target="_blank">top 10 list of problems</a>. For example, rail trails could not be funded by Transportation Enhancement dollars. The <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/dequindre-cut">Dequindre Cut</a>, <a href="http://www.clintonrivertrail.org">Clinton River Trail</a>, Macomb Orchard Trail, and other area rail-trail projects were largely built with Transportation Enhancement dollars.</p>
<p>A bipartisan amendment was introduced to restore dedicated biking and walking funding. It failed to pass, 27 to 29.</p>
<p>Michigan Congresswoman <strong>Candice Miller</strong>, a longtime support of the Macomb Orchard Trail, voted <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">against</span></em> the amendment.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next? <a title="America Bikes" href="http://americabikes.org/transportation2012/timeline/" target="_blank">According to this America Bikes timeline</a>, the bill should hit the House around the week of February 13th.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Senate is working on its own version of the transportation bill which not only maintains current biking and walking funding, it has some level of bi-partisan support.</p>
<p>Tomorrow the House Republican leadership has proposed <a title="Smart Growth America" href="http://action.smartgrowthamerica.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=9453" target="_blank">killing dedicated public transit funding</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoqnIGCguIk">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoqnIGCguIk</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/" title="More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension">More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/" title="Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails">Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/01/bike-and-pedestrian-funding-survives-again/" title="Bike and Pedestrian funding survives &#8212; again!">Bike and Pedestrian funding survives &#8212; again!</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rails-to-Trails Conservancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Routes to School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Enhancements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Rails-to-Trails Conservancy: We aren&#8217;t exaggerating when we say this ask has never been more urgent. Please read more and take action now. We have until 4 p.m. EST today to have our thoughts heard. Tomorrow, Thursday, February 2, the Transportation and Infrastructure (T&#38;I) Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives will be voting on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From <a href="http://www.railstotrails.org">Rails-to-Trails Conservancy</a>:</em></p>
<p><strong>We aren&#8217;t exaggerating when we say this ask has never been more urgent.</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Speak up now!" href="http://support.railstotrails.org/site/R?i=vx6OuyP7FaXYFI1C3gi0fQ">Please read more and take action now.</a></strong> <em>We have until 4 p.m. EST today to have our thoughts heard.</em></p>
<p><em>Tomorrow, Thursday, February 2</em>, the Transportation and Infrastructure (T&amp;I) Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives will be voting on our nation&#8217;s next multiyear surface transportation bill.</p>
<p><strong>There&#8217;s no way to spin this: From the perspective of trails, walking and bicycling, the bill is a total disaster.</strong></p>
<p>Among its worst features are:</p>
<ul>
<li>It eliminates dedicated funding for the <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/transportation-enhancements">Transportation Enhancements</a> (TE) program?the nation&#8217;s largest funding source for trails, walking and bicycling. (Terrible news, but we expected it.)</li>
<li>It removes the rail-trail category from TE eligibility.</li>
<li>It completely eliminates funding for the <a href="http://www.saferoutesmichigan.org/">Safe Routes to School</a> program.</li>
<li>It eliminates funding for bicycle and pedestrian coordinators at state DOTs.</li>
</ul>
<p>But there&#8217;s still a chance&#8230;</p>
<p>Representatives Tom Petri (R-Wis.) and Tim Johnson (R-Ill.) are considering the introduction of an amendment in the committee that would right many of the bill&#8217;s wrongs.</p>
<p><strong>But they need to hear from other committee members that their amendment has a fighting chance.</strong></p>
<p><a title="Act now!" href="http://support.railstotrails.org/site/R?i=wPAo-3kVq03XxUkVmAAzBg"><em>Please: Take two minutes and ask your representatives to defend trails, walking and bicycling.</em></a> We only have until 4 p.m. EST today, so any additional support you&#8217;re able to gather will make an enormous difference!</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Rails-to-Trails Conservancy</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/02/17/bike-transportation-funding-avoiding-a-scare/" title="Bike transportation funding: Avoiding a scare?">Bike transportation funding: Avoiding a scare?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/" title="House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking">House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/" title="More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension">More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candice Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Enhancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Bloomfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Bloomfield Trail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We mentioned a couple weeks ago that West Bloomfield had received Transportation Enhancement funding through the Road Commission for Oakland County. The Spinal Column has more exciting details: &#8220;We&#8217;re going to put a new limestone surface on top of the ballast similar to the existing trail, and have a safe road crossing at Arrowhead, Halsted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/IMG_3911.jpg"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright  wp-image-6912" title="National Bike Summit 2010: Mike Reuter, John Waterman, Candice Miller, and Todd Scott" src="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/IMG_3911-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="270" height="203" /></a><a title="mbike: 2012 transportation enhancement grants" href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/14/mdot-grants-announced-for-trails-and-streetscaping/">We mentioned a couple weeks ago</a> that West Bloomfield had received Transportation Enhancement funding through the Road Commission for Oakland County.</p>
<p><a title="Spinal Column" href="http://spinalcolumnonline.com/mdot-doles-out-611k-in-federal-money-for-trail/" target="_blank">The Spinal Column has more exciting details</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;We&#8217;re going to put a new limestone surface on top of the ballast similar to the existing trail, and have a safe road crossing at Arrowhead, Halsted and Walnut Lake,&#8221; said West Bloomfield Parks and Recreation Director Dan Navarre. &#8220;There will be 400 feet of boardwalk north of Walnut Lake over a wetland area and a pergola area with benches.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">There will be benches installed every quarter-mile and two overlooks with benches &#8211; one at Woodpecker Lake between Arrowhead and Halsted Road, and another over a large wetland area west of Halsted.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">A small parking lot will be constructed at the terminus of the trail at Haggerty Road.</p>
<p>This will add 2.5 miles of pathway and extend the West Bloomfield Trail all the way to Haggerty Road. Here it will eventually connect with the Walled Lake, Commerce, and Wixom rail-trail also under development. MDOT has also suggested building a trail bridge across M-5 to connect the trails.</p>
<p>The Road Commission is even considering a <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_table" target="_blank">speed table</a> where the trail crosses Arrowhead &#8212; an innovative traffic calming design that we&#8217;d like to see more of. Not only does it act as a stretched speed bump for cars, it tells drivers that they&#8217;re crossing the trail. It visually says that the trail has a right-of-way. This is a design we would have preferred seeing where the <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/dequindre-cut">Dequindre Cut</a> crosses streets south of Jefferson.</p>
<p>As mentioned in the Spinal Column, the West Bloomfield trail extension should be under construction by May and completed by the end of summer.</p>
<h3>Support <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/transportation-enhancements">Transportation Enhancements</a></h3>
<p>Federal Transportation Enhancement funding really makes projects like this possible, but <a title="League of American Bicyclists" href="http://capwiz.com/lab/issues/alert/?alertid=60787356" target="_blank">that funding source may get eliminated in Congress</a>. A vote on this is coming up this week in the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Local congresswoman <a title="Candice Miller" href="http://candicemiller.house.gov" target="_blank">Candice Miller</a> serves on this committee.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Please take a minute and call her office before Thursday&#8217;s vote and ask her to not eliminate this funding. Her Washington DC phone number is (202) 225-2106.</strong></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s keep this funding in the next transportation bill!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/" title="House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking">House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/14/mdot-grants-announced-for-trails-and-streetscaping/" title="MDOT grants announced for trails and streetscaping">MDOT grants announced for trails and streetscaping</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2010/12/23/detroit-bike-shorts-mdot-trails-and-windsor/" title="Detroit bike shorts: MDOT, Trails, and Windsor">Detroit bike shorts: MDOT, Trails, and Windsor</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>42.5678673 -83.3935471</georss:point>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transportation key to young staying in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/05/transportation-key-to-young-staying-in-michigan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/05/transportation-key-to-young-staying-in-michigan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complete streets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millennial Mayors Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEMCOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Detroit News ran a commentary last month written by members of the Millennial Mayors Congress, which is &#8220;a partnership of city officials and rising leaders working together to address regional issues.&#8221; Michigan&#8217;s transportation system is not getting young people where they need to go. As citizens under 35, we know that not all of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/millennialmayors"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6845" title="From the Millennial Mayors Congress Facebook page" src="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/millennial-mayors-congress-293x300.jpg" alt="" width="293" height="300" /></a>The <a title="Detroit News " href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20111215/OPINION01/112150344/1008/opinion01/Commentary-Transportation-key-young-staying-state" target="_blank">Detroit News ran a commentary</a> last month written by members of the <a title="Millennial Mayors Congress" href="http://www.millennialmayors.org/page/about" target="_blank">Millennial Mayors Congress</a>, which is &#8220;a partnership of city officials and rising leaders working together to address regional issues.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Michigan&#8217;s transportation system is not getting young people where they need to go.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">As citizens under 35, we know that not all of our peers can afford the $8,500 a year it takes, on average, to own a car. Some of us are looking to reduce our carbon footprints. Whatever the reasons, young people want to see a transportation system that gives everyone the freedom to get around, with or without a car. Unfortunately, failed transportation policies have been holding Michigan back.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Every year thousands of us leave for places that have functioning transit, safe biking and walking conditions, and convenient transportation between cities.</p>
<p>They also give support to <a href="http://www.completestreets.org/">Complete Streets</a>.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">We need to adopt a truly comprehensive &#8220;complete streets&#8221; policy, so Michiganians do not have to risk their lives to walk or bike.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth the time to read <a title="Detroit News" href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20111215/OPINION01/112150344/1008/opinion01/Commentary-Transportation-key-young-staying-state" target="_blank">the entire opinion piece</a>. It focuses mostly on public transit, which is expected since it was released during the recent Detroit light rail/bus rapid transit news.</p>
<h3>Still widening highways</h3>
<p>One minor correction? It speaks about MDOT widening highways in the past tense. MDOT is still widening highways.</p>
<p>Where did a majority of the transportation stimulus money go in Michigan? Widening an expressway. MDOT plans to spend well over a billion transportation dollars in Detroit over the next 20 years&#8230; to widen an expressway. Widening roads are still a funding priority for MDOT and many Metro Detroit municipalities.</p>
<p>Want to lose faith in Metro Detroit&#8217;s transportation decision makers? Take some time to review the road projects in <a title="SEMCOG" href="http://www.semcog.org/TIP_TransportationImprovementProgram.aspx" target="_blank">SEMCOG&#8217;s transportation improvement plan (TIP)</a>.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at the Road Commission for Oakland County&#8217;s 2012 TIP projects. They have $30.7 million in projects of which $21.8 million involves road widening.</p>
<p>Road agencies, <a href="http://semcog.org/">SEMCOG</a>, and others don&#8217;t like to publicize road widening projects because at the same time, they&#8217;re asking for more transportation funding.</p>
<p>They need the funding to continue building sprawl, but that&#8217;s not a good sales pitch &#8212; especially to millennials.</p>
<p><em><a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com/millennialmayors" target="_blank">The Millennial Mayors Congress is also on Facebook</a>.</em></p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/04/25/detroit-road-obesity-makes-for-easy-cycling/" title="Detroit road obesity makes for easy cycling">Detroit road obesity makes for easy cycling</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2010/08/08/what-complete-streets-means-for-mdot-and-transportation-in-michigan/" title="What Complete Streets means for MDOT and transportation in Michigan">What Complete Streets means for MDOT and transportation in Michigan</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2010/06/24/complete-streets-in-michigan-a-good-step-forward/" title="Complete Streets in Michigan: a good step forward">Complete Streets in Michigan: a good step forward</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/05/transportation-key-to-young-staying-in-michigan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Active Living Detroit Mini-grants now available</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/04/active-living-detroit-mini-grants-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/04/active-living-detroit-mini-grants-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This funding opportunity from the Healthy Environments Partnership is an excellent option for Detroit-based greenway programming! The Active Living Detroit Mini-Grant Program awards mini-grants of up to $1000 to Detroiters developing sustainable projects and activities that 1) engage community residents, 2) build local ownership of Detroit neighborhoods and 3) create social and physical environments that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-full wp-image-6840" title="HEP Minigrants in Detroit" src="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/active_living.jpg" alt="" width="186" height="250" />This funding opportunity from the <a title="HEP Detroit" href="http://www.hepdetroit.org/en/home/35-about-hep/111-active-living-detroit-mini-grant-program" target="_blank">Healthy Environments Partnership</a> is an excellent option for Detroit-based greenway programming!</em></p>
<p>The <strong>Active Living Detroit Mini-Grant Program</strong> awards mini-grants of up to $1000 to Detroiters developing sustainable projects and activities that 1) engage community residents, 2) build local ownership of Detroit neighborhoods and 3) create social and physical environments that promote active living and physical health.</p>
<p>Any neighborhood groups or organization located in the city of Detroit can apply. This includes, but is not limited to, block clubs, art groups, service organizations, parks and recreational organizations, churches, professional associations, public and non-public school-based groups, and individuals.</p>
<p>The Active Living Detroit Mini-Grants Program is a joint project of HEP and of the <a href="http://www.detroitfoodandfitness.com/" target="_blank">Detroit Food &amp; Fitness Collaborative</a>.</p>
<p><a title="HEP minigrant application" href="http://www.hepdetroit.org/en/component/docman/doc_download/198-active-living-detroit-application-formfinal?ItemId=73" target="_blank"><strong>Mini-grant Application</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Application deadline: </strong>February 1, 2012.</p>
<p><strong>Resource: </strong>For project ideas and information about promoting active living in communities visit:</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://kaboom.org/" target="_blank">Kaboom</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.activelivingbydesign.org/" target="_blank">Active Living by Design</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong>For more information contact</strong></p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">Julia Weinert<br />
(734) 763-0741<br />
<a href="mailto:weinertj@umich.edu">weinertj@umich.edu</a></div>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/03/22/detroit-population-loss-means-less-road-funds/" title="Detroit population loss means less road funds">Detroit population loss means less road funds</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/02/22/hep-detroit-greenway-mini-grants-announced/" title="HEP Detroit greenway mini-grants announced">HEP Detroit greenway mini-grants announced</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/01/19/natural-resources-trust-fund-applauded-and-attacked/" title="Natural Resources Trust Fund: applauded and attacked">Natural Resources Trust Fund: applauded and attacked</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/04/active-living-detroit-mini-grants-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds fail to fund Detroit&#8217;s inspired TIGER project</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/12/16/feds-fail-to-fund-detroits-inspired-tiger-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/12/16/feds-fail-to-fund-detroits-inspired-tiger-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike lanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dequindre Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamtramck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IKEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midtow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Clair County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIGER III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Disclaimer: I provided assistance to the city of Detroit on this TIGER grant application.] It wasn&#8217;t a good week in Detroit for transportation news. First came the light rail decision, and now this. The U.S. DOT did not select Detroit&#8217;s TIGER III grant. There were 828 application and only 46 were selected. The odds weren&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Tiger-III.jpg"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6690" title="Detroit TIGER III overview map" src="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Tiger-III-300x166.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="166" /></a>[Disclaimer: I provided assistance to the city of Detroit on this TIGER grant application.]</em></p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a good week in Detroit for transportation news.</p>
<p>First came the <a title="Wall Street Journal" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204844504577100660265044228.html" target="_blank">light rail decision</a>, and now this. <a title="US DOT" href="http://fastlane.dot.gov/2011/12/tiger-3.html" target="_blank">The U.S. DOT did not select Detroit&#8217;s TIGER III grant</a>.</p>
<p>There were 828 application and only 46 were selected. The odds weren&#8217;t good but Detroit&#8217;s $20 million grant request was first-class.</p>
<p>It was called <strong>Link Detroit</strong>, a Multi-model enhancement plan and <a title="Detroit's TIGER III grant application" href="http://www.detroitmi.gov/DepartmentsandAgencies/DepartmentofPublicWorks/CityofDetroitTIGERIIIGrantApplication.aspx" target="_blank">a copy of it is available on the city&#8217;s web site</a>.</p>
<p>The listed project benefits were:</p>
<ul>
<li>Implements a $25 million infrastructure project that includes bridge replacements, streetscapes, on and off road non-motorized greenways ($20 million DOT grant, $5.8 million local match)</li>
<li>Links Detroit&#8217;s core investments such as the Riverfront Conservancy and adjacent downtown central businesses through the <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/dequindre-cut">Dequindre Cut</a> and <a href="http://detroitmidtown.com/05/theloop.php">Midtown Loop</a> greenways to the <a href="http://www.detroiteasternmarket.com">Eastern Market</a>, Midtown and Hamtramck</li>
<li>Intersects major transportation routes including auto, bus, and the planned Woodward Light Rail, enabling multi modal options from anywhere in the region</li>
<li>Enhances non-motorized and multi-modal connections to:</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<li>Jobs (downtown and midtown anchors, locally owned commercial/professional services, start up establishments, hotels and restaurants, eastern market district)</li>
<li>Educational institutions (Wayne State)</li>
<li>Cultural institutions (DIA, MOCAD, DSO, theatres)</li>
<li>Recreational opportunities (Milliken State Park, numerous city parks, marinas)</li>
<li>Famers market (Eastern Market)</li>
<li>Neighborhoods (Midtown, Hamtramck, East Villages)</li>
</ul>
<li>Leverages significant investments already made in the transportation infrastructure (Campus Martius, <a href="http://www.detroitriverfront.org/">Detroit RiverWalk</a>, Woodward Light Rail, Dequindre Cut Greenway, Midtown Loop Greenway, Hamtramck Greenway) and real estate development (Downtown, Midtown, Eastern Market)</li>
<li>Provides 289 direct near term jobs, and up to 16,000 long term jobs, assuming the residential and commercial fill in development typically stimulated by this kind of investment</li>
</ul>
<p>Can Detroit just reapply for TIGER IV? That&#8217;s uncertain.</p>
<p>Congress has asked that TIGER &#8220;focus on road, transit, rail and port projects.&#8221; One source says <a title="Transportation Issues Daily" href="http://www.transportationissuesdaily.com/bicycle-pedestrian-projects-banned-from-the-2012-tiger-iv-program/" target="_blank">it&#8217;s not a ban on bike-ped oriented projects</a>, but that future focus doesn&#8217;t help Link Detroit.</p>
<p>In addition, some of the matching funds will likely be spent before the next TIGER round, and therefore will become ineligible.</p>
<p>Detroit had received $25 million in the first round of TIGER grants. That money was to be spent on the Woodward light rail and will now be applied towards planning bus rapid transit. We don&#8217;t know what role this previous award and the city&#8217;s current financial situation had in this grant request cycle.</p>
<h3>No Dequindre Cut Extension?</h3>
<p>This does not stop the planned Dequindre Cut extension. The city has a purchase agreement for the private property from Gratiot to Mack and is now doing due diligence. The funding is there to keep moving this project forward.</p>
<p>Eventually the Midtown and Hamtramck connections will be built once the needed funding is found. TIGER III would have put these critical projects on the front burner.</p>
<h3>Other Michigan TIGER grants</h3>
<p>The only successful TIGER III grant was for $3.6 million to rebuild 2.6 miles of road in St. Clair County which &#8220;provides essential access to the County&#8217;s only landfill facility.&#8221; Yeah, that stinks.</p>
<p>That said, we&#8217;re not surprised the <a title="Canton/MDOT TIGER III grant request" href="http://www.canton-mi.org/municipalservices/wwct_study.aspx" target="_blank">MDOT/Canton TIGER request</a> was rejected. This was a $22 million project to improve the IKEA exit on I-275.</p>
<p>The required grant section on <strong>Livability</strong> appears to have been written in the 1980s or earlier. One claimed project benefit is it will improve the quality of life by having &#8220;a safer operational and connected network to and from the surrounding community and the freeway network.&#8221; That and they won&#8217;t remove the existing bike path.</p>
<p>The grant&#8217;s section on <strong>Alternative Transportation and Sustainable Development</strong> says, Canton is &#8220;committed to promoting sustainable development opportunities and alternative transportation options for residents.&#8221; Canton opted out of SMART. You cannot take the SMART bus to the IKEA store.</p>
<p>If anything, this is an example of why transportation in Michigan is not a sustainable model. We let a major traffic generator locate in an area which lacks the existing transportation infrastructure to handle it. And now Canton (and MDOT) want taxpayers to fix their $22 million mistake.</p>
<p>IKEA even mentioned in their support letter for this grant that &#8220;when IKEA was considering potential locations for our Michigan store, we had strong concerns about the interchange.&#8221;</p>
<p>But to be fair, there are other costly expressway exit examples, from the Chrysler headquarters to the Great Lakes Crossing at Baldwin. We have a history of funding mistakes.</p>
<p>The bottom line is Michigan can&#8217;t afford to keep ignoring the obvious relationship between land use and transportation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/10/16/detroit-tiger-iii-grant-a-multi-modal-enhancement-plan/" title="Detroit TIGER III grant: a multi-modal enhancement plan">Detroit TIGER III grant: a multi-modal enhancement plan</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/04/04/our-economic-stimulus-bike-projects/" title="Our Economic Stimulus Bike Projects">Our Economic Stimulus Bike Projects</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2008/04/15/dequindre-cut-trail-progress/" title="Dequindre Cut Trail Progress">Dequindre Cut Trail Progress</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/12/16/feds-fail-to-fund-detroits-inspired-tiger-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>42.3463364 -83.0404358</georss:point>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commerce rail-trail section gets critical funding</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/12/09/commerce-rail-trail-section-gets-critical-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/12/09/commerce-rail-trail-section-gets-critical-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Township]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lake to Lake Trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huron Valley Trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walled Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Bloomfield Trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wixom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three is a charm for the Commerce, Walled Lake and Wixom rail-trail. After two previous rejections, the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund recommended they receive a $3,755,400 grant to acquire the now-abandoned rail corridor which runs between the West Bloomfield Trail and the Huron Valley Trail in Wixom. This near 33 acres provides a critical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/trail-map.jpg"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="size-medium wp-image-5587 alignright" title="Great Lake to Lake Trail" src="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/trail-map-300x106.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="106" /></a>Three is a charm for the Commerce, Walled Lake and Wixom rail-trail.</p>
<p>After two previous rejections, the <a title="Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund" href="http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/MNRTF_Recommendations_FINAL_370798_7.pdf" target="_blank">Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund recommended</a> they receive a $3,755,400 grant to acquire the now-abandoned rail corridor which runs between the West Bloomfield Trail and the Huron Valley Trail in Wixom.</p>
<p>This near 33 acres provides a critical connection between the two trails mentions, but especially in the context of the Great Lake to Lake Trail which connects St. Clair to Lake Michigan. This new trail would also connect with the planned M-5 Trail which is a northern?extension?to the I-275 Metro Trail.</p>
<p>The funding also includes acquisition of the?Walled Lake Train Depot which would be used as a historic stopping point along the route.</p>
<p>Other projects in Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne Counties were recommended:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>City of Dearborn (Wayne County)</strong> is recommended to receive $268,900 to develop a new bridge across the Huron River on the Camp Dearborn non-motorized trail with a fishing pier and canoe launch.</li>
<li><strong>City of Detroit (Wayne County)</strong> is recommended to receive $300,000 for improvements to Jayne-Lasky Playfield, including development of walking trails, relocation of a soccer field, renovations to two softball diamonds, landscaping improvements and site amenities.</li>
<li><strong>City of Detroit (Wayne County)</strong> is recommended to receive $300,000 for improvements to Lipke Playfield, including relocation of a football field, conversion of open space, horseshoe courts, renovation of a softball diamond, walking trails, landscaping and site amenities.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.metroparks.com/">Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority</a> (Oakland County)</strong> is recommended to receive $94,000 for improvements to Kensington Metropark to include a pond overlook, replace a seawall, walks and railing, group seating area, interpretive signage, viewing scopes and accessibility to pond dipping programs.</li>
<li><strong>City of Inkster (Wayne County)</strong> is recommended to receive $300,000 to construct a trail within the Lower Rouge Parkway System.</li>
<li><strong>City of Lathrup Village (Oakland County)</strong> is recommended to receive $50,000 to replace playground equipment at Goldengate Park.</li>
<li><strong>Oakland Township (Oakland County)</strong> is recommended to receive $300,000 to develop a paved trail, boardwalks, pedestrian bridges, interpretive/directional signage and fishing access on the Paint Creek Trail/Polly Ann Trail south connector.</li>
<li><strong>Southeast Michigan Eco-Region Consolidation</strong> is recommended to receive $1,475,000 for the acquisition of critical in-holdings within existing boundaries in state parks and recreation areas, state game areas, state harbors and Natural Rivers areas.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/04/04/third-time-a-charm-for-wixom-area-rail-trail/" title="Third time a charm for Wixom-area Rail-Trail?">Third time a charm for Wixom-area Rail-Trail?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/06/04/wixom-gets-on-board-with-new-trail-group/" title="Wixom gets on board with new trail group">Wixom gets on board with new trail group</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/11/29/detroit-area-trail-projects-seek-trust-fund-dollars/" title="Detroit-area Trail projects seek Trust Fund dollars">Detroit-area Trail projects seek Trust Fund dollars</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/12/09/commerce-rail-trail-section-gets-critical-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Senate transportation bill: Bad news for biking</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/08/draft-senate-transportation-bill-bad-news-for-biking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/08/draft-senate-transportation-bill-bad-news-for-biking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[League of American Bicyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAP-21]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal transportation bill is a major source of funding for biking projects in Michigan. As the bill has evolved over time, it&#8217;s become more supportive of biking projects. That positive forward momentum maybe over with the latest draft bill called MAP-21. Stay tuned for what steps we can take to push back on this. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal transportation bill is a major source of funding for biking projects in Michigan. As the bill has evolved over time, it&#8217;s become more supportive of biking projects.</p>
<p>That positive forward momentum maybe over with the latest draft bill called <strong>MAP-21</strong>.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for what steps we can take to push back on this.</p>
<p>From the <a title="League of American Bicyclists" href="http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/11/bicycling-and-walking-organizations-respond-to-map%E2%80%9021/" target="_blank">League of American Bicyclists web site</a> &#8211;</p>
<p><em>Late last week, the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works released their draft of the surface transportation authorization bill, the law that will determine transportation programs and funding. The?<a href="http://americabikes.org/">America Bikes Coalition</a>?has reviewed the?<a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&amp;FileStore_id=20f89548-8b2e-4498-89f7-c9f4ff22484f">600 page document?</a>and issued the following statement:</em></p>
<p>The America Bikes coalition ? representing the nation?s leading bicycling and walking groups ? today expressed their appreciation for the continued inclusion of funding opportunities for biking and walking in MAP&#8208;21.</p>
<p>America Bikes remains deeply concerned, however, that bicycling and walking programs suffer disproportionate cuts in funding in the new bill, and that significant additional activities are made eligible for these limited funds. We remain committed to working with the EPW Committee and full Senate to resolve these issues, especially in the light of the Senate?s continued, strong bi&#8208;partisan support for bicycle and pedestrian funding as shown in several recent votes on the Senate floor.</p>
<p>The process of honoring the public?s strong support for these programs begins immediately with amendments that have been introduced already by Senate supporters of dedicated funding for non&#8208;motorized transportation.</p>
<p>Specific concerns include:</p>
<p>1. The current dedicated funding programs for bicycling and walking are combined into one program, with significantly less funding;</p>
<p>2. An expanded list of eligible activities are added to this smaller funding pot, including such big&#8208;ticket items as NEPA compliance and land acquisition for wetland mitigation; and</p>
<p>3. The proposed bill effectively allows states to completely opt out of the program and would allow all this money to be redirected to highway construction.</p>
<p>The America Bikes coalition calls on the leaders of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to restore dedicated funding for bicycling and walking in MAP&#8208;21 and remove the opt&#8208;out provision that would encourage States to eliminate funding for these two modes altogether.</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/" title="House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking">House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/" title="Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails">Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/" title="More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension">More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/08/draft-senate-transportation-bill-bad-news-for-biking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bike and Pedestrian funding survives &#8212; again!</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/01/bike-and-pedestrian-funding-survives-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/01/bike-and-pedestrian-funding-survives-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complete streets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debbie Stabenow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Harkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Enhancements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate just voted 38 to 60 which preserves critical federal funding called Transportation Enhancements. Enhancements are the primary funding source for bike and pedestrian projects. Had we lost this funding, it would have devastated our efforts to make Detroit and all of Michigan more bike-friendly. The run up to this vote was colorful. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4969" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 253px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; float: right;"><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/IMG_3466.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4969  " title="Senators Levin and Stabenow escort Transportation Secretary LaHood on the RiverWalk" src="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/IMG_3466-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="243" height="183" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Senators Levin and Stabenow escort Transportation Secretary LaHood on the RiverWalk, a project that has received Enhancements funding.</p></div>
<p><a title="Rails to Trails" href="http://community.railstotrails.org/blogs/trailblog/archive/2011/11/01/breaking-news-senate-rejects-amendment-to-cut-funding-for-trails-biking-and-walking.aspx?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RTCTrailBlog+%28RTC+TrailBlog%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">The U.S. Senate just voted 38 to 60</a> which preserves critical federal funding called <strong><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/transportation-enhancements">Transportation Enhancements</a></strong>.</p>
<p>Enhancements are the primary funding source for bike and pedestrian projects. Had we lost this funding, it would have devastated our efforts to make Detroit and all of Michigan more bike-friendly.</p>
<p>The run up to this vote was colorful. Senator Rand Paul played up America&#8217;s failing bridges while decrying wasteful Enhancements spending. The only problem? The <strong>Associated Press </strong>researched his claims and found them to be &#8220;exaggerated and misrepresented&#8221; according to the article, <a title="Yahoo News" href="http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-gop-lawmakers-spin-funding-tall-tales-120816229.html" target="_blank">FACT CHECK: GOP lawmakers spin funding tall tales</a>.</p>
<p>Both Michigan Senators, <strong>Carl Levin</strong> and <strong>Debbie Stabenow</strong>, <a title="League of American Bicyclists" href="http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/11/senator-pauls-anti-bike-amendment-fails-60-senators-voted-against-it/" target="_blank">voted to continue this funding</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone who contacted their senators prior to today&#8217;s vote.</p>
<p>When we contacted Senator Stabenow regarding this issue, she provided this positive response:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Thank you for contacting me about federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle trails. I share your concerns.<br clear="all" /> <br clear="all" />Michigan&#8217;s lush natural resources and unique landscapes present many opportunities for residents and visitors to make use of our bike paths, hiking trails and other non-motorized pathways. These areas not only provide recreational enjoyment for Michigan residents, but also attract much-needed tourism and economic activity to our state. <br clear="all" /> <br clear="all" />In the past, Senator <strong>Tom Harkin</strong> (D-Iowa) has introduced legislation that would require most federally funded transportation projects to accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transportation users. If related legislation should come before me for a vote, I will be sure to keep your views in mind.</p>
<p>The Harkin bill she mentions is for <a href="http://www.completestreets.org/">Complete Streets</a>.</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/" title="House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking">House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/" title="Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails">Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/" title="More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension">More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/11/01/bike-and-pedestrian-funding-survives-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possible changes for Michigan road funding</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/10/26/possible-changes-for-michigan-road-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/10/26/possible-changes-for-michigan-road-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Enhancements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=6442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are just three potential changes which could greatly affect road funding &#8212; including bike funding &#8212; throughout Michigan. The Good According to Crain&#8217;s Detroit Business, Governor Rick Synder will call for changes to how Michigan collects tax revenues on motor vehicle fuel. Rather than collect a fixed amount per gallon sold at the pump, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are just three potential changes which could greatly affect road funding &#8212; including bike funding &#8212; throughout Michigan.</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<p><a title="Crains Detroit Business" href="http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20111025/FREE/111029945/snyder-wants-to-replace-current-fuel-tax-with-levy-on-wholesale-price" target="_blank">According to Crain&#8217;s Detroit Business</a>, Governor Rick Synder will call for changes to how Michigan collects tax revenues on motor vehicle fuel. Rather than collect a fixed amount per gallon sold at the pump, he is proposing a percent rate on the wholesale fuel cost. While it won&#8217;t raise taxes initially, the total taxes collected will increase with inflation and fuel price increases.</p>
<p>It makes sense to us.</p>
<p>Getting the state legislature to increase the fuel tax, something that hasn&#8217;t happened in 14 years, is difficult. The Governor&#8217;s proposal removes the need to vote on any tax increases.</p>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<p><a title="Spinal Column" href="http://spinalcolumnonline.com/lawmaker-offers-proposal-to-repeal-michigans-gas-tax/#comment-13746" target="_blank">According to the Spinal Column newspaper</a>, State Senator <strong>Howard Walker</strong>, a Republican from Traverse City, also wants to eliminate fuel taxes at the pump. He wants to replace the lost tax funding by raising the state sales tax by 1%.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right. Rather than have motorists pay for roads, everyone would.</p>
<p>Those who drive more, say perhaps people in northern parts of the state, would pay less for their roads while those who drive less or not at all would pick up the tab. <strong>This proposal would subsidize driving more than we already do.</strong></p>
<p>According to a recent national study, only 51% of road costs are paid by road users. This drop that percentage further with the difference coming from general tax sources.</p>
<h3>The Ugly</h3>
<p>The <a title="Washington Post" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/next-capitol-hill-battle-federal-transportation-funding-mandates/2011/10/14/gIQAR3LpDM_story.html" target="_blank">Washington Post has this article</a> outlining the very real possibility that <a title="MDOT Transportation Enhancements" href="http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-9621_17216_18231---,00.html" target="_blank">Transportation Enhancement funding</a> could be stripped from the next federal transportation bill &#8212; or at least made optional at the state level. Enhancements represents about 2% of the total transportation bill.</p>
<p><strong>Losing Transportation Enhancement funding would be devastating to bike facilities development in Michigan and across the U.S..</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>This is a primary source of funding for on-road improvements, like the 16 miles of new bike lanes in Southwest Detroit. This funding also supports trail development such as the <a href="http://www.detroitriverfront.org/">Detroit RiverWalk</a> and <a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/dequindre-cut">Dequindre Cut</a>. And finally, it&#8217;s also used for streetscaping which improves walkability while often providing bike parking.</p>
<p>While cyclists and others have banded together to fight off prior attacks on this funding, times are different.</p>
<p>Please <a title="U.S. House" href="http://www.house.gov/" target="_blank">contact your Congressperson</a> to let them know we cannot lose <strong><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/tags/transportation-enhancements">Transportation Enhancements</a></strong>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/03/house-transportation-bill-a-disaster-for-biking-and-walking/" title="House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking">House transportation bill: a disaster for biking and walking</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/02/01/act-now-house-transportation-bill-a-total-disaster-for-biking-walking-and-trails/" title="Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails">Act now! House transportation bill a &#8220;total disaster&#8221; for biking, walking and trails</a></li><li><a href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2012/01/29/more-on-the-west-bloomfield-trail-extension/" title="More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension">More on the West Bloomfield Trail extension</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2011/10/26/possible-changes-for-michigan-road-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

