Comments on: More on the Royal Oak Rail-with-Trail proposal http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2010/02/07/more-on-the-royal-oak-rail-with-trail-proposal/ Promoting non-motorized transportation in the Motor City Fri, 18 May 2012 06:22:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Jennifer Hill http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2010/02/07/more-on-the-royal-oak-rail-with-trail-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-4297 Jennifer Hill Sat, 08 May 2010 14:52:02 +0000 http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=3495#comment-4297 Hello, I live in Oakland County now and am on the MTGA Board, but used to live in Somerville, Massachsuetts. We have a great multi-use path there and have been working with the transit agency and the commercial railroad to get rail with trail. The website is a little old, but the contact info is still good. Hello,
I live in Oakland County now and am on the MTGA Board, but used to live in Somerville, Massachsuetts. We have a great multi-use path there and have been working with the transit agency and the commercial railroad to get rail with trail. The website is a little old, but the contact info is still good.

]]> By: Larry S http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2010/02/07/more-on-the-royal-oak-rail-with-trail-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-3277 Larry S Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:29:25 +0000 http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=3495#comment-3277 I think this would be a great trail however, Grand Trunk originally relocated this line "kicking and screaming" back in the 1920s. I get the feeling they would not be very warm to this at all. I don't think it's because they are obstructionist. I think it is because the proposal has nothing to do with their business and there is nothing in it for them. Great find on the 1932 article too. I think this would be a great trail however, Grand Trunk originally relocated this line “kicking and screaming” back in the 1920s. I get the feeling they would not be very warm to this at all. I don’t think it’s because they are obstructionist. I think it is because the proposal has nothing to do with their business and there is nothing in it for them.

Great find on the 1932 article too.

]]>