<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Urbanism: Built to Last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-built-to-last/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-built-to-last/</link>
	<description>Promoting non-motorized transportation in the Motor City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 06:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-built-to-last/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=2171#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>I think they are erring on the side of higher density, which probably isn&#039;t realistic as you point out. It looks like there are some European cities at that density. A city like Toronto might be more realistic, and if my math is correct, emulating their density would require about 100 square miles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they are erring on the side of higher density, which probably isn&#8217;t realistic as you point out. It looks like there are some European cities at that density. A city like Toronto might be more realistic, and if my math is correct, emulating their density would require about 100 square miles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterg</title>
		<link>http://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-built-to-last/comment-page-1/#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>misterg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-bike.org/blog/?p=2171#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>The numbers employed in the video don&#039;t add up
40 sqr mile/million people= 2230 sqr ft /person @ 2 stories per development
doesn&#039;t leave enough for schools (elementary, middle, high, trade and university) or stores (groccery, hardware, haircut, electrontics, bike, clothes, resturant, etc.)
what about a garage/storage for my bike, kayak, smart cart, hobbies, etc.

the sprawl numbers work out fine with approx 11,000 sqr ft/person @ single level development</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers employed in the video don&#8217;t add up<br />
40 sqr mile/million people= 2230 sqr ft /person @ 2 stories per development<br />
doesn&#8217;t leave enough for schools (elementary, middle, high, trade and university) or stores (groccery, hardware, haircut, electrontics, bike, clothes, resturant, etc.)<br />
what about a garage/storage for my bike, kayak, smart cart, hobbies, etc.</p>
<p>the sprawl numbers work out fine with approx 11,000 sqr ft/person @ single level development</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

