This entry was posted
on Friday, June 12th, 2009 at 6:01 pm and is filed under Planning.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The numbers employed in the video don’t add up
40 sqr mile/million people= 2230 sqr ft /person @ 2 stories per development
doesn’t leave enough for schools (elementary, middle, high, trade and university) or stores (groccery, hardware, haircut, electrontics, bike, clothes, resturant, etc.)
what about a garage/storage for my bike, kayak, smart cart, hobbies, etc.
the sprawl numbers work out fine with approx 11,000 sqr ft/person @ single level development
I think they are erring on the side of higher density, which probably isn’t realistic as you point out. It looks like there are some European cities at that density. A city like Toronto might be more realistic, and if my math is correct, emulating their density would require about 100 square miles.
June 18th, 2009 at 4:15 am
The numbers employed in the video don’t add up
40 sqr mile/million people= 2230 sqr ft /person @ 2 stories per development
doesn’t leave enough for schools (elementary, middle, high, trade and university) or stores (groccery, hardware, haircut, electrontics, bike, clothes, resturant, etc.)
what about a garage/storage for my bike, kayak, smart cart, hobbies, etc.
the sprawl numbers work out fine with approx 11,000 sqr ft/person @ single level development
June 19th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
I think they are erring on the side of higher density, which probably isn’t realistic as you point out. It looks like there are some European cities at that density. A city like Toronto might be more realistic, and if my math is correct, emulating their density would require about 100 square miles.